AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the Defendant's appeal against the revocation of his probation by the district court.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Eddy County, Lisa B. Riley, District Judge: The district court revoked the Defendant's probation.

Parties' Submissions

• Defendant-Appellant: Argued that the State failed to prove he willfully violated the terms of his probation (para 2).
• Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the State failed to prove the Defendant willfully violated the terms of his probation.

Disposition

• The appeal was summarily affirmed, upholding the district court's revocation of the Defendant's probation (para 3).

Reasons

• Per BOGARDUS, Judge (HANISEE, Chief Judge, and IVES, Judge, concurring): The Court considered the Defendant's memorandum in opposition but remained unpersuaded that the State failed to prove the Defendant willfully violated his probation terms. The Defendant did not present new facts, law, or arguments sufficient to overturn the notice of proposed disposition. The Court referenced previous case law emphasizing the burden on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or law, which the Defendant failed to do (para 2).