AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • Donald Ray Bishop appealed against the Lea County Commissioners, involving all five district commissioners as respondents. The specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Lea County, presided over by Judge William G. W. Shoobridge, with the decision date not provided in the text.

Parties' Submissions

  • Petitioner-Appellant: Donald Ray Bishop, representing himself, appealed the decision from the District Court of Lea County. The specific arguments he presented are not detailed in the provided text (N/A).
  • Respondents-Appellees: The Lea County Commissioners, represented by Maddox, Holloman & Kirksey, P.C., Lee A. Kirksey. The specific arguments they presented are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the Court of Appeals should proceed with the appeal despite the absence of a memorandum opposing summary dismissal.

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed.

Reasons

  • Judges James J. Wechsler, Jonathan B. Sutin, and J. Miles Hanisee concurred in the decision to dismiss the appeal. The dismissal was based on the petitioner-appellant's failure to file a memorandum opposing the proposed summary dismissal within the allotted time frame (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.