AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves an appeal concerning the estate of Charles M. Crossley. Glen Baumgartner, the claimant-appellant, contested matters related to the estate against the respondent-appellee, whose specific grievances or claims are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Quay, Albert Mitchell, District Judge, with a decision date of February 13, 2014. The specific holdings of the lower court are not provided in the text.

Parties' Submissions

• Appellee: The specific arguments made by the appellee are not detailed in the provided text. (N/A)
• Appellant (Glen Baumgartner): As a pro se appellant, Baumgartner represented himself, but his specific arguments or claims against the estate are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• The specific legal issues considered by the Court of Appeals are not detailed in the provided text.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the District Court of Quay. (para 2)

Reasons

• Per Michael E. Vigil, J., with Cynthia A. Fry, J., and Timothy L. Garcia, J., concurring: The Court of Appeals proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision. (paras 1-3)