AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case revolves around the petitioner's appeal for a review of the district court's order regarding her entitlement to unemployment benefits.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Santa Fe County, Barbara J. Vigil, District Judge, July 5, 2011: The district court issued an order concerning the petitioner's entitlement to unemployment benefits.

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellant: Sought review of the district court's order concerning her entitlement to unemployment benefits.
• Respondent-Appellee: Indicated that it does not oppose the appellate court's proposed disposition to reverse the district court's decision.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order concerning the petitioner's entitlement to unemployment benefits was supported by the evidence.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals reversed the district court's decision and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Reasons

• Per LINDA M. VANZI, J. (JAMES J. WECHSLER, J., and JONATHAN B. SUTIN, J., concurring): The appellate court proposed to reverse the district court's decision on the basis that it was unsupported by the evidence. The Department of Workforce Solutions, as the respondent-appellee, did not oppose this proposed disposition. Consequently, the appellate court reversed and remanded the case for reasons stated in the calendar notice.