AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves an appeal by the Defendant against the district court's order which vacated further hearings and closed the matter. Both parties represented themselves pro se in the appeal.

Procedural History

• District Court of Santa Fe County, Judge Bryan P. Biedscheid: Ordered vacating further hearings and closing the matter.

Parties' Submissions

• Defendant-Appellant: Argued against the district court's decision to vacate further hearings and close the matter.
• Plaintiff-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in vacating further hearings and closing the matter.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling of the district court.

Reasons

• The decision was made by a panel consisting of Judges Kristina Bogardus, Jacqueline R. Medina, and Shammara H. Henderson. The Court considered the Defendant's memorandum in opposition but found it insufficient to address the concerns identified by the Court, including mootness of many issues raised. The Defendant failed to specifically point out errors of law and fact, and merely repeating earlier arguments did not fulfill the requirement to overturn the proposed summary affirmation. The Court's decision to affirm was based on the Defendant's inability to demonstrate clear errors in fact or law in the district court's decision (paras 1-3).