AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves a dispute between Petitioner and Respondent over the relocation of their child to Italy with the Respondent.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Roosevelt County, Drew D. Tatum, District Judge: The district court determined that the parties' child could relocate to Italy with the Respondent.

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellant: Indicated that he will not be filing a memorandum opposing this Court’s proposed disposition.
• Respondent-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's determination that the parties' child could relocate to Italy with the Respondent should be affirmed.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's determination that the parties' child could relocate to Italy with the Respondent.

Reasons

• Per Jonathan B. Sutin, with James J. Wechsler and Cynthia A. Fry concurring, the Court issued a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm the district court's determination. The Petitioner responded to this Court's notice, indicating a decision not to file a memorandum opposing the Court's proposed disposition. Based on the reasons stated in the Court's notice of proposed disposition, the decision of the district court was affirmed.