AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves an appeal by the Plaintiff against the Defendants following a bench trial that resulted in an adverse judgment against the Plaintiff. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Nan G Nash, District Judge, January 28, 2016: Adverse judgment entered against the Plaintiff following a bench trial.

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant: The Plaintiff appealed the adverse judgment from the district court but failed to file a memorandum opposing the court's proposed summary disposition despite being granted an extension (para 1).
  • Defendants-Appellees: The specific arguments made by the Defendants-Appellees are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the district court's adverse judgment against the Plaintiff should be affirmed due to the Plaintiff's failure to oppose the proposed summary disposition.

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the adverse judgment entered by the district court against the Plaintiff (para 2).

Reasons

  • Per J. Miles Hanisee, with Jonathan B. Sutin and Timothy L. Garcia, JJ., concurring: The Court decided to affirm the district court's judgment primarily because the Plaintiff did not file a memorandum opposing the court's proposed summary disposition, despite being granted an extension. The decision was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, which the Plaintiff failed to contest (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.