AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the Defendant-Appellant, David Elliott Castle, who appealed from the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss based on claims of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant: Argued for the dismissal of the case on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy.
• Appellee: The specific arguments of the Appellee (State of New Mexico) are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in denying the Defendant-Appellant's motion to dismiss on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to deny the Defendant-Appellant's motion to dismiss.

Reasons

• The panel of judges, consisting of Timothy L. Garcia, Jonathan B. Sutin, and J. Miles Hanisee, concurred in the decision to affirm the district court's denial of the Defendant-Appellant's motion to dismiss. The decision was based on reasons previously stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition, which the Defendant-Appellant chose not to oppose further by not filing a memorandum in opposition (paras 1-3).