AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Ulibarri v. Najar (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 10/21/2019
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-37361
Relations See full-text opinion - Ulibarri v. Najar - 10/21/2019 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • District Court of San Miguel County, Gerald E. Baca, District Judge: [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Petitioner-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Respondents-Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The appeal was affirmed (para 1).

Reasons

  • VANZI, Judge, with JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge, and KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge, concurring: The Court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No opposition to the summary affirmance was filed within the allotted time, leading to the decision to affirm the appeal (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.