AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Plaintiff appealed from a district court order that granted summary judgment in favor of the Defendants. The specifics leading to the appeal, including the nature of the dispute between the parties, are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Lea County: Granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: The Plaintiff's arguments or evidence challenging the district court's decision are not specified in the provided text (N/A).
• Defendants-Appellees: Filed a memorandum in support of the proposed summary disposition by the Court of Appeals, but their specific arguments are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants was in error.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants.

Reasons

• Per MEDINA, J. (HANISEE, C.J., and ATTREP, J., concurring): The Court of Appeals proposed to summarily affirm the district court's decision based on the Plaintiff's docketing statement, which apparently failed to demonstrate error. The Defendants supported this proposed disposition. The Plaintiff did not respond to the proposed summary disposition, and the time for doing so passed. Citing Frick v. Veazey, the Court noted that failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the proposed disposition. Therefore, for the reasons provided in their calendar notice, the Court affirmed the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants (paras 1-2).