This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- Defendants-Appellants Scott K. Jeffers and Athena Jeffers, in a self-represented capacity, were involved in legal proceedings against Plaintiff-Appellee Pennymac Loan Services. The case pertains to motions regarding the dismissal for lack of standing and a motion for summary judgment filed by Pennymac.
Procedural History
- District Court of Sandoval County, John F. Davis, District Judge: Denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing and granted a motion for summary judgment filed by Pennymac.
Parties' Submissions
- Defendants-Appellants: Argued for the dismissal of the case for lack of standing (para 1).
- Plaintiff-Appellee: Filed a motion for summary judgment against the Defendants-Appellants (para 1).
Legal Issues
- Whether the district court erred in denying Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of standing.
- Whether the district court was correct in granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of standing and granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (para 2).
Reasons
-
Per Timothy L. Garcia, J. (J. Miles Hanisee, J., and M. Monica Zamora, J., concurring): The Court of Appeals proposed summary affirmance for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. Pennymac supported the notice of proposed disposition, and no opposing memorandum was filed within the allotted time frame, leading to the affirmation of the district court's decisions (paras 1-3).
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.