AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the Plaintiff, Justin Miller, appealing from a district court order that denied his motion for judgment on the pleadings and granted the Defendants', The GEO Group, Inc. and Dwayne Santistevan, cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings. The specifics leading to this legal action are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Lea County: Denied Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and granted Defendants' cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: Initially contested the district court's decision but ultimately conceded that the district court did not err in its ruling, suggesting that the current ruling should stand.
• Defendants-Appellees: Arguments or specific submissions made by the Defendants-Appellees are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• (N/A)

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order denying the Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting the Defendants' cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Reasons

• KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge, with BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge, and SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge, concurring: The appellate court decided to affirm the district court's decision based on the Plaintiff's concession that the district court did not err in its ruling. The Plaintiff's response to the court's notice of proposed disposition did not point out any errors of fact or law, which led the court to construe the response as a memorandum in support of the proposed disposition (para 1).