AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The Defendant appealed the dismissal of his de novo appeal in the district court. The State filed a notice indicating it does not intend to oppose the Defendant's summary reversal request.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Doña Ana County, Lisa C. Schultz, District Judge: The Defendant's de novo appeal was dismissed.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant (Defendant): Sought reversal of the dismissal of his de novo appeal in the district court. (N/A)
  • Appellee (State): Filed a notice indicating it does not intend to oppose the Defendant's request for summary reversal.

Legal Issues

  • Whether the dismissal of the Defendant's de novo appeal in the district court should be reversed.

Disposition

  • The dismissal of the Defendant's de novo appeal in the district court is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings in the district court.

Reasons

  • Per LINDA M. VANZI, Judge (CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge, and JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge concurring): The court decided to reverse the dismissal of the Defendant's de novo appeal based on the reasons stated in their notice of proposed summary disposition. The State's decision not to oppose the summary reversal was also noted.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.