Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-41645
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE
OF JOSE REYMUNDO PADILLA,
and
BRIDGET PADILLA, Personal
Representative of the Estate,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSEPH SAUCEDA,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
JOE Y. ARREDONDO, NELLIE ARREDONDO,
JOSE ARREDONDO JR., and DENAE HURST,
Defendants.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Elaine P. Lujan, District Court Judge
Bridget Padilla
Albuquerque, NM
Pro Se Appellee
Joseph Sauceda
Albuquerque, NM
Pro Se Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DUFFY Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the proposed disposition has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MEGAN P. DUFFY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge
KATHERINE A. WRAY, Judge