Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,546 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 45 documents
Decision Content
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-38108
CLOUD COUNTRY WEST UNITS
TWO AND THREE PROPERTY
OWNERS ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CHUCK HARDGRAVE AND
MELISSA HARDGRAVE, husband
and wife,
Defendants-Appellants.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY
Angie K. Schneider, District Judge
Courvoisier Law, LLC
Rebekah A. Scott Courvoisier
Alamagordo, NM
for Appellee
Richard A. Hawthorne
Ruidoso, NM
for Appellants
MEMORANDUM OPINION
, Judge.
{1} We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in this matter proposing to affirm the district court. Appellee has filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary disposition, and Appellant has not filed a memorandum in opposition.
CONCLUSION
{2} Accordingly, for the reasons set out in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge
WE CONCUR:
J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge