Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
ZACHARIAS V. ARCH HURLEY CONSERVANCY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
KANDACE ZACHARIAS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ARCH HURLEY CONSERVANCY,
Defendants-Appellee.
No. 33,553
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 29, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF QUAY COUNTY, Donna J.
Mowrer, District Judge
COUNSEL
Martin E. Threet & Associates, Martin E. Threet, Alonzo Maestas, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Butt, Thorton & Baehr, P.C., Emily A. Franke, Raul Sedillo, Neysa E. Lujan, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge