Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,546 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 45 documents
Decision Content
VILLA V. MOLINA
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
DANIEL J. VILLA,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
NANCY MOLINA,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 33,880
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 24, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY, Daniel
Viramontes, District Judge
COUNSEL
DeLaney & Hernandez, LLC, Amy C. DeLaney-Hernandez, Deming, NM, for Appellant
Couture Law, Rosalie Fragoso, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
{1} Petitioner appeals from a district court order dismissing his petition for custody of his minor child. We issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm. Respondent filed a memorandum in support; Petitioner has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(3) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge