Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,546 documents
Decision Content
WARREN V. BOOTHBY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MICHELLE M. WARREN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LEO BOOTHBY, Individually; ALAN H. MAESTAS, Individually;
and MAESTAS & BOOTHBY, a professional corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
and
SAMUEL M. HERRERA, Deponent-Appellant.
Docket No. 29,290
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
August 27, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Abigail
Aragon, District Judge.
COUNSEL
Stephanie M. Zorie, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee Warren.
Jonathan Hull, Taos, NM, for Appellees Lee Boothby, Alan Maestas, and Maestas & Boothby.
Samuel Herrera, Taos, NM, for Appellant.
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge