Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
TITUS V. TITUS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
HEATHER LAVONNE TITUS,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL WAYNE TITUS,
Respondent-Appellant,
No. 33,999
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 12, 2015
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY,
William C. Birdsall, District Judge
COUNSEL
Heather Lavonne Titus, West Jordan, UT, Pro Se Appellee
Michael Wayne Titus, Farmington, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Affirmed.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge