Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
STRAUTINS V. MARTINEZ
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ROBERT D. STRAUTINS; LAURENCE J.
and JACQUELINE N. ELLIOT; CRAIG
D. and MICHELLE I. MCGREGOR;
ROBERT L. and MYRA B. HULL; JOHN
J. and MARY ELLEN BURKE; BURT
MICHAEL and CINDY PLOTKIN; KLAUS
VOIGTLANDER; and JAMES G. FARIS,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DOMINGO MARTINEZ, Santa
Fe County Assessor, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 32,771 [CONSOLIDATED WITH No. 32,802; No. 32,803; No. 32,804; No. 32,805; No. 32,806; No. 32,807; and No. 32,808]
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
August 5, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Sarah
M. Singleton, District Judge
COUNSEL
L. Helen Bennett, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
Bridget Jacober, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Defendants-Appellees have filed a memorandum in support of the calendar notice proposing summary affirmance of dismissal.
{3} Affirmed.
{4} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge