Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. RODRIGUEZ
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 32,103
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 20, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY,
Fernando R. Macias, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Jacqueline L. Cooper, Chief Public Defender, Karl Erich Martell, Assistant Appellate Defender, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Jose Angel Rodriguez (Defendant) appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated stalking (violation of a protection order). [RP 160] This Court issued a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm, and Defendant has filed a timely memorandum in opposition to the proposed summary affirmance. In his memorandum, Defendant fails to rebut or dispute any of the analysis contained in our notice of proposed summary disposition. Instead, he requests that this Court assign his appeal to the general calendar to reconsider some of the cases relied upon in our proposed summary disposition. [MIO 3] We decline to do so.
Therefore, for the reasons set forth in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm Defendant’s conviction and sentence.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge