Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. MARTINEZ
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JOHN PAUL MARTINEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 32,896
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 17, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Denise Barela-Shepherd, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Margaret McLean, Assistant Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee
Rothstein, Donatelli, Hughes, Dahlstrom, Schoenburg & Bienvenu, LLP, Morgan Honeycutt, Evan P. Woodward, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Affirmed.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge