Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,517 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. M ELVIDGE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARSHALL ELVIDGE, Defendant-Appellant.
Docket No. 28,827
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 24, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY, Sandra
A. Price, District Judge.
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee.
Scott M. Curtis, Farmington, NM, for Appellant.
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge