Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Hennessy v. Duryea - cited by 666 documents
Decision Content
STATE V. GISHEY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TANYA GISHEY,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 33,217
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
December 3, 2013
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF McKINLEY COUNTY, Robert
A. Aragon, District Judge
COUNSEL
Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, Jacqueline R. Medina, Assistant Attorney General, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
Thomas Nececkas, Gallup, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} The State appealed from the district court’s amended order dismissing the case with prejudice on double jeopardy grounds. This Court issued a notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm the district court’s order. The State has filed a response to this Court’s notice, indicating that it will not be filing a memorandum opposing this Court’s proposed disposition. See Hennessy v. Duryea, 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d 683 (“Our courts have repeatedly held that, in summary calendar cases, the burden is on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or law.”). Accordingly, for the reasons stated in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we affirm.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge