Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Derrick

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 10/28/2013
Docket Numbers 32,879
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; MICHAEL E. VIGIL; J. MILES HANISEE
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Derrick (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 10/28/2013
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,587 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. DERRICK

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SERENITY DERRICK,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 32,879

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

October 28, 2013


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY, Gary L. Clingman, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Ching Law Firm, Alexander B. Ching, Hobbs, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

{1}       Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       Affirmed.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

J. MILES HANISEE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.