Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

State v. Alirez

Collection Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Date 01/30/2012
Docket Numbers 31,448
Decision-maker(s) MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE; JONATHAN B. SUTIN; CYNTHIA A. FRY
Opinion Type Unreported Opinions
Relations See AI generated summary - State v. Alirez (AI Generated Opinion Summaries) - 01/30/2012
Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,587 documents

Decision Content

STATE V. ALIREZ

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CARLOS ALIREZ,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 31,448

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 30, 2012


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Stan Whitaker, District Judge

COUNSEL

Gary K. King, Attorney General, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Ron Sanchez, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

Affirmed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.