Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
STATE EX REL. CSED/HSD V. MAY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.
CSED/HSD, and M. SUSH MAY,
Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
DAVID MAY,
Respondent-Appellant.
No. 31,979
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 13, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Elizabeth E. Whitefield, District Judge
COUNSEL
CSED/HSD, Betsy R. Salcedo, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee Human Services Department
David Foster Law Firm, David R. Foster, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee M. Sush May
La Morena Law, LLC, Elena Moreno Hansen, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge