Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
SISNEROS V. AZTEC WELL SERVICING CO.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
ROSS SISNEROS,
Worker-Appellant,
v.
AZTEC WELL SERVICING COMPANY, and
KEENAN & ASSOCIATES,
Employer/Insurer-Appellee.
No. 33,452
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 7, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Terry Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
Titus & Murphy, Victor A. Titus, Farmington, NM, for Appellant
Justin Gonzalez, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ZAMORA, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} REVERSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge