Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
SAKURA V. CHESAPEAKE OPERATING
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
JULIE SAKURA, as Personal Representative
of the Estate of SERGIO RAUL MONTANO-
MORENO, and GLORIA MORENO,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC., UNITED
DRILLING, INC., DIXIE ELECTRIC, INC.,
SWEATT CONSTRUCTION, INC., and
JAMES BAUCOM,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
McELVAIN OIL & GAS PROPERTIES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 31,804
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 22, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY,
Barbara Vigil, District Judge
COUNSEL
Sommerman & Quesada, LLP, George (Tex) Quesada, Dallas, TX, Fadduol, Cliff & Hardy, P.C., Sam Fadduol, Richard Hardy, Lubbock, TX, for Appellees
Miller Stratvert PA, Timothy R. Briggs, Thomas R. Mack, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants United Drilling, Inc.
McCormick, Caraway & Tabor, LLP, Matthew T. Byers, Carlsbad, NM, for Appellants McElvain Oil & Gas
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
McElvain Oil & Gas Properties, Inc. (McElvain) seeks to appeal from an order granting co-Defendant United Drilling, Inc.’s (United’s) motion for summary judgment, together with a stipulated order dismissing all of Plaintiffs’ claims against United. We filed a notice of proposed summary disposition on February 13, 2012, proposing to dismiss for want of a final, appealable order. On March 1, 2012, memoranda in support were filed by United and Plaintiffs. No memorandum in opposition has been filed, and the time for doing so has passed.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the notice of proposed summary disposition, this appeal is dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge