Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents

Decision Content

SAKURA V. CHESAPEAKE OPERATING

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

JULIE SAKURA, as Personal Representative
of the Estate of SERGIO RAUL MONTANO-
MORENO, and GLORIA MORENO,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC., UNITED
DRILLING, INC., DIXIE ELECTRIC, INC.,
SWEATT CONSTRUCTION, INC., and
JAMES BAUCOM,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
McELVAIN OIL & GAS PROPERTIES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 31,804

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

March 22, 2012


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Barbara Vigil, District Judge

COUNSEL

Sommerman & Quesada, LLP, George (Tex) Quesada, Dallas, TX, Fadduol, Cliff & Hardy, P.C., Sam Fadduol, Richard Hardy, Lubbock, TX, for Appellees

Miller Stratvert PA, Timothy R. Briggs, Thomas R. Mack, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants United Drilling, Inc.

McCormick, Caraway & Tabor, LLP, Matthew T. Byers, Carlsbad, NM, for Appellants McElvain Oil & Gas

JUDGES

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

AUTHOR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

McElvain Oil & Gas Properties, Inc. (McElvain) seeks to appeal from an order granting co-Defendant United Drilling, Inc.’s (United’s) motion for summary judgment, together with a stipulated order dismissing all of Plaintiffs’ claims against United. We filed a notice of proposed summary disposition on February 13, 2012, proposing to dismiss for want of a final, appealable order. On March 1, 2012, memoranda in support were filed by United and Plaintiffs. No memorandum in opposition has been filed, and the time for doing so has passed.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the notice of proposed summary disposition, this appeal is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.