Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
RUNYAN V. MERINO
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
WESLEY RUNYAN and
JAN RUNYAN,
Plaintiff-Appellees,
vs.
EDUARDO J. MERINO, Individually
and d/b/a/ J.E.M. CONSTRUCTION,
Defendant-Appellant,
No. 31,831
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
June 4, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CHAVES COUNTY, Charles
C. Currier, District Judge
COUNSEL
Sanders, Bruin, Coll & Worley, P.A., Clayton S. Hightower, Roswell, NM, for Appellee
Bernadette Sedillo, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GARCIA, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge