Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
ROLDAN V. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MARIA ROLDAN, Individually and as
Parent and/or Guardian of KEILA
ORTIZ, DIANA ORTIZ, and KALEB
GONZALEZ, Minors, and KEVIN
NAVARRO,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE and
JOHN STOTT,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 35,140
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 23, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Beatrice J. Brickhouse, District Judge
COUNSEL
Southwest Legal Group, Robert J. Andreotti, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellants
Trisha A. Walker, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Affirmed.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge