Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,546 documents
Decision Content
RANCHO RUIDOSO V. LINCOLN COUNTY
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
PROPERTY OWNERS COMMITTEE OF RANCHO RUIDOSO
VALLEY ESTATES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
COUNTY OF LINCOLN, Defendant,
and
RABBI Y’HOSHUA COHEN, Applicant/Intervenor-Appellant.
Docket No. 29,439
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
August 28, 2009
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY, Karen
L. Parsons, District Judge.
COUNSEL
John Robert Beauvais, Ruidoso, NM, for Appellee.
Rabbi Y’Hoshua Cohen, Alto, NM, Pro Se Appellant.
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge