Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
PINO V. JARAMILLO
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MICHELLE L. PINO, f/k/a,
MICHELLE L. JARAMILLO,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
ADRIAN JARAMILLO,
Respondent-Appellant.
NO. 30,838
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 25, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN MIGUEL COUNTY, John
M. Pasternoster, District Judge
COUNSEL
Victoria W. Doom, Las Vegas, NM, for Appellee
Leverick & Musselman, Elizabeth A. Musselman, Taos, NM, for Appellant
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge