Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents

Decision Content

NEW MEXICO MEDICAL BOARD V. SEIDEL

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

NEW MEXICO MEDICAL BOARD,
Appellee-Respondent,
v.
WALTER RAY SEIDEL, JR., M.D.,
Appellant-Petitioner.

No. A-1-CA-36460

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

October 3, 2017


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY, Jerry H. Ritter Jr., District Judge

COUNSEL

Richard B. Word, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellee

Miguel Garcia, Alamogordo, NM, for Appellant

JUDGES

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge, JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

AUTHOR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

{1}       Appellant-Petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari, seeking review of disciplinary action taken by Appellee-Respondent. We granted the petition and issued a calendar notice proposing to reverse and remand. Appellee-Respondent has filed a responsive memorandum indicating that it does not oppose our proposed summary disposition. Appellant-Petitioner has filed no response, and the deadline to do so has passed.

{2}       Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with due process considerations.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

WE CONCUR:

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.