Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
MONTOYA V. WHITCHURCH
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MARK E. MONTOYA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
REISHA WHITCHURCH, and
JOSEPH A. NARVAIZ,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 33,512
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
July 15, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY, Sarah
M. Singleton, District Judge
COUNSEL
Mark E. Montoya, Rio Rancho, NM, Pro Se Appellee
Reisha M. Whitchurch, Santa Fe, NM, Joseph A. Narvaiz, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellants
JUDGES
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge