Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,535 documents
Decision Content
MONTAÑO V. BACA-LUCERO
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
SANDRA MONTAÑO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
GLORIA BACA-LUCERO
and MARY ANN BACA-LUCERO,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 31,991
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 9, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Eugenio S.
Mathis, District Judge
COUNSEL
Carol A. Neelley, Taos, NM, for Appellee
Wray & Girard, P.C., Katherine Wray, Duff Westbrook, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge