Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
LUCERO V. LUCERO
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
KATHERINE LUCERO and PATRICIA BAINES,
Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
JASON LUCERO and DEBRA WILHITE,
Interested Party
and
MICHAEL MANG,
Intervenor-Appellant.
NO. 31,375
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 22, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Gerard J. LaVelle, District Judge
COUNSEL
Katherine A. Lucero, Ruidoso, NM, Patricia Ann Baines, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se
Jason Lucero, Albuquerque, NM, Michael S. Mang, Albuquerque, NM, Debra Wilhite, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se
Charlotte Mary Toulouse, Albuquerque, NM, Guardian ad Litem
JUDGES
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge