Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
HIDALGO V. KROWL
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MELISSA MIREYA HIDALGO,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
DAVID ISAAC KROWL,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 33,146
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
April 29, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOÑA ANA COUNTY, Mary
W. Rosner, District Judge
COUNSEL
Grace B. Duran, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee
David Isaac Krowl, Las Cruces, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Chief Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
J. MILES HANISEE, Judge