Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
GUILLORY V. N.M. AOC
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
JOSEPH GUILLORY,
Worker-Appellant,
v.
NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE
OF THE COURTS and DONA ANA COUNTY
MAGISTRATE COURT ENTITIES OF THE
STATE OF NEW MEXICO, a Self-Insured
Employer,
Employer-Appellee.
No. 32,977
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 6, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Terry S. Kramer, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
Perales Law Group PC, J. Marcos Perales-Piña, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellant
Morgan Lyman, Las Cruces, NM, for Appellee
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Worker appealed the denial of his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. Employer filed a memorandum in support of the proposed affirmance; however, Worker has not filed a memorandum in opposition and the time for doing so has expired. Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we affirm the decision of the worker’s compensation judge in this case.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge