Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
GLERUP V. THAT CAR PLACE, INC.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MARK GLERUP,
Worker-Appellant,
v.
THAT CAR PLACE, INC.,
Employer-Appellee,
and
NEW MEXICO UNINSURED EMPLOYERS’ FUND,
Statutory Third Party-Appellee.
NO. 35,406
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 19, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
Michael J. Doyle, Los Lunas, NM, for Appellant
Narvaez Law Firm, PA, Henry F. Narvaez, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Richard J. Crollett, Attorney for UEF, Albuquerque, NM, for Statutory Third Party-Appellee
JUDGES
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge. WE CONCUR: RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} Summary reversal and remand was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary reversal and remand has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
WE CONCUR:
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge