Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
FRANCO V. FEINGOLD
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
IRENE FRANCO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM FEINGOLD, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 31,675
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
January 24, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY,
Nan G. Nash, District Judge
COUNSEL
Irene Franco, Albuquerque, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Simone, Roberts & Weiss PA, Randal William Roberts, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee William Feingold
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
Affirmed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge