Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents
Decision Content
DUNCAN V. SANTA FE GOLD
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MICHAEL DUNCAN,
Worker-Appellee,
vs.
SANTA FE GOLD and
CRAWFORD & COMPANY,
Employer/Insurer-Appellants.
No. 33,734, WCA 2009-59750
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
November 18, 2014
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Shanon S. Riley, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
David S. Proffit, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellee
Hale & Dixon PC, Timothy S. Hale, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants
JUDGES
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge. WE CONCUR: CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
{1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} DISMISSED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
WE CONCUR:
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge