Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,472 documents

Decision Content

DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. V. JACOBS

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.,
and SELENE FINANCE LP,
Plaintiffs-Appellees
v.
RUBY HANDLER JACOBS a/k/a
RUBY JACOBS, MICHAEL
JACOBS,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION
SYSTEMS, INC., AS NOMINEE FOR ENCORE
CREDIT CORP.; VISTA DEL NORTE HOMEOWNERS’
ASSOCIATION, INC.; CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA N.A.;
SANTA FE CANYON RANCH, LLC; THE NEW MEXICO
LAW GROUP, P.C.; NEW MEXICO MUTUAL CASUALTY
COMPANY; HOWARD GITLEN; andWARREN A. EATON;
TRUSTEE OF THE WARREN A. EATON, JR. CPA PROFIT
SHARING PLAN TRUST,
Defendants.

No. A-1-CA-36649

COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO

January 2, 2018


APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, Alan M. Malott, District Judge

COUNSEL

Rose L. Brand & Associates, P.C., Eraina M. Edwards, Elizabeth Dranttel, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees

Cravens Law LLC, Richard H. Cravens, IV, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellants

JUDGES

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge, EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge

AUTHOR: LINDA M. VANZI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Chief Judge.

{1}       Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

{2}       DISMISSED.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

HENRY M. BOHNHOFF, Judge

EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.