Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,546 documents
Decision Content
BURNS V. PROCLEAN
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
MICHAEL BURNS,
Worker-Appellant,
v.
PROCLEAN OF ARIZONA and
TRAVELERS INSURANCE,
Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
NO. 35,496
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
September 14, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
Rod Dunn, Rio Rancho, NM, for Appellant
Sebastian A. Dunlap, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIGIL, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} AFFIRMED.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge