Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents
Decision Content
BLECHLE V. VINCENT
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
CHARLES BLECHLE, SALLY
BLECHLE, CHERYL KURK,
PEGGY CHESTER, JOSEPH D.
ALBILLAR, and JOHN
D. MOSES,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SANGRE ROSE, LLC,
JIM VINCENT, and
PATRICIA VINCENT,
Defendants-Appellants.
NO. 30,572
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
March 2, 2011
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY,
Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge
COUNSEL
Scheuer, Yost & Patterson, Kristofer C. Knutson, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
Sangre Rose, LLC, Jim and Patricia Vincent, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellants
JUDGES
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KENNEDY, Judge.
Appellants (Defendants) appeal from the district court’s “order granting motion to enforce settlement agreement.” [RP 311] Our notice proposed to affirm. Defendants did not file a memorandum in opposition. See Frick v. Veazey, 116 N.M. 246, 247, 861 P.2d 287, 288 (Ct. App. 1993) (recognizing that the failure to file a memorandum in opposition to a calendar notice constitutes acceptance of a proposed disposition). Appellees (Plaintiffs) filed an untimely memorandum supporting our proposed affirmance. For reasons set forth in the notice, we affirm.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge