Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,502 documents
Decision Content
APFEL V. BLAIR
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
HORST APFEL and LILO APFEL,
CO-TRUSTEES OF THE HORST
AND LILO APFEL QUALIFIED
DOMESTIC REVOCABLE TRUST
U/T/A/D 12-21-12,
Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
DAKOTA M. BLAIR,
Respondent-Appellant.
No. 34,917
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
April 18, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY,
Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge
COUNSEL
Sommer Karnes & Associates LLP, Karl H. Sommers, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
Dakota M. Blair, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellant
JUDGES
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ZAMORA, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed and the time for doing so has expired. DISMISSED.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge