Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,546 documents
Decision Content
ARMIJO V. KOHLS
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
TIMOTHY A. ARMIJO,
Worker-Appellant,
v.
KOHLS and AIG,
Employer/Insurer-Appellees.
NO. 31,240
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
February 21, 2012
APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION,
Gregory D. Griego, Workers’ Compensation Judge
COUNSEL
Timothy A. Armijo, Santa Fe, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Allen, Shepherd, Lewis & Chapman, P.A., Kimberly A. Syra, Albuquerque, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge. WE CONCUR: JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
AUTHOR:
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FRY, Judge.
Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. AFFIRMED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge