DIRECT LINE: 403.297.5355 DIRECT FAX: 403.297.2082 E-MAIL: tom.graham@asc.ca Headnote National Policy 11-203 Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions - issuer deemed to be no longer a reporting issuer under securities legislation. Applicable Alberta Statutory Provisions Securities Act, R.S.A., 2000, c.S-4, section 153 Citation: Anatolia Energy Corp., Re, 2013 ABASC 347 Date: 20130806 File No.: CMP0066380 Bennett Jones LLP 4500 Bankers Hall East 855 - 2nd Street SW Calgary, AB T2P 4K7 Attention: Chris Straub Dear Sir: Re: Anatolia Energy Corp. (the Applicant) - Application for a decision under the securities legislation of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario (the Jurisdictions) that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer The Applicant has applied to the local securities regulatory authority or regulator (the Decision Maker) in each of the Jurisdictions for a decision under the securities legislation (the Legislation) of the Jurisdictions that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer. In this decision, “securityholder” means, for a security, the beneficial owner of the security. The Applicant has represented to the Decision Makers that: (a) the outstanding securities of the Applicant, including debt securities, are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by fewer than 15 securityholders in each of the jurisdictions of Canada and fewer than 51 securityholders in total worldwide; (b) no securities of the Applicant, including debt securities, are traded in Canada or another country on a marketplace as defined in National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation or any other facility for bringing together buyers and sellers of securities where trading data is publicly reported; SUITE 600, 250 – 5TH STREET S.W., CALGARY, ALBERTA, CANADA, T2P 0R4 TEL: 403.297.6454 FAX: 403.297.6156 www.albertasecurities.com
- 2 - (c) the Applicant is applying for a decision that it is not a reporting issuer in all of the jurisdictions of Canada in which it is currently a reporting issuer; and (d) the Applicant is not in default of any of its obligations under the Legislation as a reporting issuer, each of the Decision Makers is satisfied that the test contained in the Legislation that provides the Decision Maker with the jurisdiction to make the decision has been met and orders that the Applicant is deemed to have ceased to be a reporting. “original signed by” Tom Graham, CA Director, Corporate Finance #4583784
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.