Orders and Exemptions

Decision Information

Decision Content

Headnote

Mutual Reliance Review System for Exemptive Relief Applications -- issuer deemed to have ceased to be a reporting issuer.

Ontario Statutes

Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am., s. 83.

Montreal, May 1st 2006

Stikeman, Elliott LLP
1155 René-Lévesque Blvd. West
40th Floor
Montreal (Québec)
H3B 3V2
Attention: Mathieu Grenier

RE: Advanced Fiber Technologies (AFT) Income Fund (the "Applicant") -- Application to cease to be a Reporting Issuer under the securities legislation of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Québec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador (the "Jurisdictions")

Dear Sir:

The Applicant has applied to the local securities regulatory authority or regulator (the "Decision Maker") in each of the Jurisdictions for a decision under the securities legislation (the "Legislation") of the Jurisdictions to be deemed to have ceased to be a reporting issuer in the Jurisdictions.

As the Applicant has represented to the Decision Makers that:

• the outstanding securities of the Applicant, including debt securities, are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by less than 15 security holders in each of the jurisdictions in Canada and less than 51 security holders in total in Canada;

• no securities of the Applicant are traded on a marketplace as defined in National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation;

• the Applicant is applying for relief to cease to be a reporting issuer in all of the jurisdictions in Canada in which it is currently a reporting issuer; and

• the Applicant is not in default of any of its obligations under the Legislation as a reporting issuer,

each of the Decision Makers is satisfied that the test contained in the Legislation that provides the Decision Maker with the jurisdiction to make the decision has been met and orders that the Applicant is deemed to have ceased to be a reporting issuer.

"Louis Auger"
Chef du Service du financement des sociétés
Autorité des marchés financiers

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.