Archived Notices, Instruments, Rules and Policies

Multilateral CSA Notice 45-311 Exemptions from Certain Financial Statement-Related Requirements in the Offering Memorandum Exemption to Facilitate Access to Capital by Small Businesses January 11, 2013 Introduction The securities regulatory authorities in Yukon, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Manitoba, Québec, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador (the “participating jurisdictions” or “we”) are each publishing a harmonized interim local order (OM-form exemption order) that provides exemptions from certain requirements of Form 45-106F2 Offering memorandum for non-qualifying issuers (Form 45-106F2). Form 45-106F2 is the required form under the offering memorandum prospectus exemption (OM exemption) in section 2.9 of National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions. The OM exemption is available in all jurisdictions other than Ontario. The objective in issuing the OM-form exemption orders is to facilitate capital raising for early stage businesses and other small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) while maintaining appropriate investor protection. The OM-form exemption orders will be issued concurrently with this notice or as soon as possible following the notice. The OM-form exemption orders will be effective immediately upon being issued. Each OM-form exemption order will be available on the website of the securities regulatory authority issuing it. This notice summarizes the OM-form exemption orders and includes a request for comments. Background Securities legislation requires that purchasers of securities be provided with a prospectus that contains full, true and plain disclosure of all material facts relating to the securities being offered. However, securities legislation has always provided exemptions from the prospectus requirement in situations where purchasers do not need the protections of the prospectus requirement or alternative protections are available. The OM exemption was intended to provide a variety of issuers, including early stage businesses and other SMEs, with a cost-effective capital-raising option. We have heard from some early stage businesses and SMEs that the OM exemption is too costly to use. The main concern they raise is the cost of preparing audited financial statements. Based on this feedback we have considered whether it is appropriate to provide exemptions from certain financial statement- related and audit requirements in Form 45-106F2 for early stage businesses and SMEs. Substance of OM-form exemption orders The OM-form exemption orders provide a harmonized alternative for financings below a certain threshold. Under this alternative regime, certain issuers relying on the OM exemption are exempt from:

-2- • the requirement to obtain an audit on financial statements or other financial information, and • the requirement for financial statements to be prepared using Canadian GAAP applicable to publicly accountable enterprises (IFRS). An issuer can rely on the OM-form exemption orders subject to certain conditions, including the following: • the issuer is not a reporting issuer, investment fund, mortgage investment entity or an issuer engaged in the real estate business; • the issuer is not distributing complex securities; • the amount raised by an issuer group (the issuer and certain related issuers) under the OM-form exemption orders must never exceed $500,000; and • the aggregate acquisition cost of all securities distributed under the OM-form exemption orders by an issuer group to a purchaser in a distribution and in the 12 months preceding the date of such distribution, must not exceed $2,000. The OM exemption includes a number of other conditions. They continue to apply to issuers relying on the OM-form exemption orders. They include the resale restrictions, the risk acknowledgment form requirement, the obligation to file reports of exempt distribution, the payment of applicable fees and language requirements. Nothing in the OM-form exemption orders modifies any rights, recourses or rights of action that an investor may have under securities legislation. The OM-form exemption orders do not include any exemption from dealer or adviser registration requirements. An issuer group that wishes to go beyond any of the maximum thresholds under the alternative regime provided by the OM-form exemption orders can do so if it complies with the standard terms of the OM exemption or relies on one of the other capital raising prospectus exemptions. The OM-form exemption orders continue until December 20, 2014. During this time, we will review the comments received from market participants and monitor the use of the OM-form exemption orders to determine whether to pursue further regulatory amendments and, if so, the nature and extent of any such amendments. Crowdfunding and other SME initiatives We have been and will continue to monitor initiatives that develop in other jurisdictions related to financing of early stage businesses and SMEs. Securities-based crowdfunding is one area that has received media attention. This type of capital raising is currently permitted in a few international jurisdictions. It involves raising small

-3- amounts of money from a large number of investors over the Internet via a website, generally referred to as a funding portal. While it is contemplated by the U.S. Jumpstart our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act), it is not yet permitted in the U.S. and will not be until the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and others make the necessary rules to provide a regulatory framework. The OM-form exemption orders are not intended to address, nor be our response to, securities- based crowdfunding. Nevertheless, we have compared the existing securities regulatory regime in Canada (in all jurisdictions other than Ontario) and, in particular, the OM exemption with the crowdfunding provisions of the JOBS Act. Although the SEC has not yet provided the details, the contemplated disclosure requirements for issuers using the JOBS Act crowdfunding exemption seem similar to those under the OM exemption. The availability of a prospectus exemption is only one aspect of securities-based crowdfunding. Another important consideration is the regulation applicable to the funding portals (the entities proposing to operate websites through which issuers may offer their securities to potential purchasers). Staff think that operating a funding portal that intermediates trades would trigger the dealer registration requirement under National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations. We note that the regulation of funding portals is developing in various ways in different international jurisdictions. At this time, we are not proposing a particular regulatory model for funding portals. CSA staff are prepared to consider applications for registration by funding portals on a case-by-case basis. Comments We invite market participants to comment on whether the conditions in the OM-form exemption orders sufficiently address the financing needs of early stage businesses and SMEs while still providing appropriate investor protection and whether we should consider other modifications to the OM exemption. In addition, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) has recently published OSC Staff Consultation Paper 45-710 Considerations For New Capital Raising Prospectus Exemptions. Although we did not participate in the development of the OSC consultation paper, we encourage our market participants to review and comment on the questions raised in it and to share their comments with us as well. We are inviting comments until February 20, 2013. Please submit your comments in writing. If you are sending your comments by email, please also send an electronic file containing the submissions in Microsoft Word.

-4- Please address your comments to the following participating jurisdictions: Alberta Securities Commission Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan Manitoba Securities Commission Autorité des marchés financiers Nova Scotia Securities Commission New Brunswick Securities Commission Newfoundland Securities Commission Prince Edward Island Securities Office Department of Community Services, Government of Yukon Office of the Superintendent of Securities, Government of the Northwest Territories Legal Registries Division, Department of Justice, Government of Nunavut Please send your comments only to the addresses below. Your comments will be forwarded to the other participating jurisdictions. Denise Weeres Senior Legal Counsel, Corporate Finance Alberta Securities Commission Suite 600, 250-5 th Street SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 0R4 Fax: 403-297-2082 denise.weeres@asc.ca Anne-Marie Beaudoin Corporate Secretary Autorité des marchés financiers 800, square Victoria, 22e étage C.P. 246, tour de la Bourse Montréal, Québec H4Z 1G3 Fax: 514-864-6381 consultation-en-cours@lautorite.qc.ca Please note that comments received will be made publicly available and may be posted on the websites of certain of the participating jurisdictions. We cannot keep submissions confidential. Questions Please direct your questions to any of the following: Michel Bourque Valérie Dufour Senior Policy Advisor , Policy and Regulation Analyst, Corporate Finance Department Autorité des marchés financiers Autorité des marchés financiers 514-395-0337 ext: 4389 or 1-877-525-0337 514-395-0337 ext: 4466 or 1-877-525-0337 valerie.dufour@lautorite.qc.ca michel.bourque@lautorite.qc.ca

-5- Denise Weeres Senior Legal Counsel, Corporate Finance Alberta Securities Commission (403) 297-2930 or 1-(877) 355-4488 denise.weeres@asc.ca Chris Besko Deputy Director, Legal Counsel Manitoba Securities Commission (204) 945-2561 1-800-655-5244 chris.besko@gov.mb.ca Don Boyles Program & Policy Development Securities Commission of Newfoundland, Newfoundland and Labrador (709) 729-4189 dboyles@gov.nl.ca Donn MacDougall Deputy Superintendent of Securities, Legal and Enforcement Northwest Territories Securities Office 867-920-8984 donald_macdougall@gov.nt.ca Katharine Tummon Superintendent of Securities The Office of the Superintendent of Securities, P.E.I. (902) 368-4569 kptummon@gov.pe.ca Frederik Pretorius Superintendent of Securities Director of Corporate Affairs Department of Community Services, Yukon 867.667-5225 Email: Fred.Pretorius@gov.yk.ca Thomas Sloan Legal Counsel, Market Regulation Alberta Securities Commission (403) 355.4478 or (877) 355-4488 thomas.sloan@asc.ca Susan Powell Senior Legal Counsel, Regulatory Affairs New Brunswick Securities Commission 506 643-7697 1-866-933-2222 susan.powell@nbsc-cvmnb.ca Shirley Lee, Q.C. Director, Policy and Market Regulation and Secretary to the Commission Nova Scotia Securities Commission (902) 424-5441 or 1-855-424-2499 leesp@gov.ns.ca Louis Arki Director, Legal Registries Legal Registries Department of Justice, Nunavut (867) 975-6587 larki@gov.nu.ca Sonne Udemgba Deputy Director, Legal/Exemption Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan (306) 787-5879 sonne.udemgba@gov.sk.ca